| Sl.No. | Citation | Brief Details |
| 7 | Mr. E.S. Sanjeeva Rao vs Central Bureau of Investigation (C.B.I.), CPFC, DD(VIG) and OTHERS/a> | Provident Fund Commissioners are Judges: Absolute Immunity U/S 7A of EPF & MP Act |
| 6 | PIL: 45/2009 | Mumbai High Court Judgement of PIL No:45/2009 filed by Sri Sudarshan Kumar, APFC |
| 5 | Pfizer Employees'' Union, A Trade ... vs Regional Provident Fund | Claim for continuation of exemption U/P 27, 27A without condition |
| 4 | Nandinee Travels Pvt. Ltd. vs Regional Provident Fund | Clubbing of two establishment-Test |
| 3 | Om Sai Hotels And Restaurants, A ... vs The Regional ProvidentFund | Infancy protection and clubbing of hotel and restaurant discussed |
| 2 | Basf India Limited And Anr. vs M. Gurusamy | Employee ; in connection with the work of establishment: statutory definition means there should be nexus but it may be loose and incidental. personal drivers of company's manager held to be employee |
| 1 | Mr.E.S.Sanjeeva Rao vs Central Bureau of Investigation(CBI), Mumbai & Ors. | Petitioner (7A Authority) was dischargingthe functions of a Judge within the meaning of Section 19 of the IPC isindisputable, hence criminal action for offence punishable under Section 420 r/w 120-B of theIndian Penal Code can not be initiated by CBI. THIS IS AN INTERIM ORDER IN CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2637 OF 2010 IN BOMBAY HIGH COURT |